<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Session #19 &#8212; Reinheitsgebot und Philosophie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bathtubbrewery.com/2008/09/05/the-session-19-reinheitsgebot-und-philosophie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bathtubbrewery.com/2008/09/05/the-session-19-reinheitsgebot-und-philosophie/</link>
	<description>Brewed in a bathtub so you can taste the difference!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:12:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr Weiz Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.bathtubbrewery.com/2008/09/05/the-session-19-reinheitsgebot-und-philosophie/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Weiz Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bathtubbrewery.com/?p=331#comment-153</guid>
		<description>A well-put argument, well written too. From what I&#039;ve read, a good number of German brewers would agree with you - I mentioned Georg Schneider&#039;s comments in my write up on Aventinus (http://52brews.com/?p=11). 

The problem now is that since these laws have been in place since the beginning of time, there really isn&#039;t a German market for experimental beer (anything &#039;outside the box&#039;). Removing or appending the laws would appease some of the more daring brewers, but only a small percentage of the consumers. Even Schneider&#039;s Hopfenweisse (which was quite good, by the way) was poorly received in Germany- and that wasn&#039;t a far stretch. 

My opinion: it&#039;s worth the shake-up, even if it only affects a small group. Brewing innovation over the last 15-20 years in America has given way to countless new styles and techniques, and expanded the market share of the craft brew industry there. The trends will catch on eventually in other countries too, if the laws allow. I, for one, would love to see a German Double Chocolate Stout.  

Anyhow, great writing. I&#039;ll be adding a link to your site, feel free to do the same should you see fit. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well-put argument, well written too. From what I&#8217;ve read, a good number of German brewers would agree with you &#8211; I mentioned Georg Schneider&#8217;s comments in my write up on Aventinus (<a href="http://52brews.com/?p=11" rel="nofollow">http://52brews.com/?p=11</a>). </p>
<p>The problem now is that since these laws have been in place since the beginning of time, there really isn&#8217;t a German market for experimental beer (anything &#8216;outside the box&#8217;). Removing or appending the laws would appease some of the more daring brewers, but only a small percentage of the consumers. Even Schneider&#8217;s Hopfenweisse (which was quite good, by the way) was poorly received in Germany- and that wasn&#8217;t a far stretch. </p>
<p>My opinion: it&#8217;s worth the shake-up, even if it only affects a small group. Brewing innovation over the last 15-20 years in America has given way to countless new styles and techniques, and expanded the market share of the craft brew industry there. The trends will catch on eventually in other countries too, if the laws allow. I, for one, would love to see a German Double Chocolate Stout.  </p>
<p>Anyhow, great writing. I&#8217;ll be adding a link to your site, feel free to do the same should you see fit. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bathtubbrewery.com/2008/09/05/the-session-19-reinheitsgebot-und-philosophie/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bathtubbrewery.com/?p=331#comment-134</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very well put. I am in no way a beer connoisseur, and don&#039;t intend to become one, so I have very little reason to read this blog other than the fact that it is well written. But, since this post is a comment on the human condition rather than the nuances of brewery, here I am typing in this little box...

What follows is a brief retort -- in the form of an example from a bad movie -- on this comment: &quot;It points to the power of belief at the expense of reason, the propensity for people to feel when they could instead think. It restrains progress and inhibits learning, endangering our development as a species.&quot;

Regrettably, the movie is I, Robot. There is a point at which Will Smith&#039;s character is talking to his love-interest about what had happened to his arm, during which he relates the story of how a robot opted to save him instead of a little girl because it had calculated his chances of survival to be greater than hers.

I&#039;m all about logic -- hell, that&#039;s what I do. But sometimes, the &quot;human condition&quot; wins out because of irrational decisions, not in spite of them. The right decision would have been to save the girl. 

Logical reasoning is only infallible in a strictly logical system. I am yet to be convinced that we (humans) have that.

Plus, if the damn thing would have just saved the girl I wouldn&#039;t have had to endure that awful movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very well put. I am in no way a beer connoisseur, and don&#8217;t intend to become one, so I have very little reason to read this blog other than the fact that it is well written. But, since this post is a comment on the human condition rather than the nuances of brewery, here I am typing in this little box&#8230;</p>
<p>What follows is a brief retort &#8212; in the form of an example from a bad movie &#8212; on this comment: &#8220;It points to the power of belief at the expense of reason, the propensity for people to feel when they could instead think. It restrains progress and inhibits learning, endangering our development as a species.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regrettably, the movie is I, Robot. There is a point at which Will Smith&#8217;s character is talking to his love-interest about what had happened to his arm, during which he relates the story of how a robot opted to save him instead of a little girl because it had calculated his chances of survival to be greater than hers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all about logic &#8212; hell, that&#8217;s what I do. But sometimes, the &#8220;human condition&#8221; wins out because of irrational decisions, not in spite of them. The right decision would have been to save the girl. </p>
<p>Logical reasoning is only infallible in a strictly logical system. I am yet to be convinced that we (humans) have that.</p>
<p>Plus, if the damn thing would have just saved the girl I wouldn&#8217;t have had to endure that awful movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
